, with some modification [8]. Briefly, PHELP DNA was amplified with the primer pair PhelpFsoe(LI)/PhelpRsoe from the plasmid pPL2luxPHelp [16] and fused between two DNA fragments amplified from the regions flanking P llsA by splicing by overlap extension (SOE) PCR [17]. The upstream region was amplified with the primer pair PllsAchgA(LI) and PllsAchgB(LI) and the downstream region was amplified with primers PllsAchgC and PllsAchgD. All PCRs were performed using Vent DNA polymerase (NEB, New England AZD2281 manufacturer Biolabs, MA, USA). The SOE PCR product was cloned into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of check details pORI280 following

PstI and EcoRI (NEB) digestion and ligation with the Ligafast rapid DNA ligation system (Promega, Madison, USA). The sequence of the cloned product was verified with MCS primers pORI280For/Rev by MWG Biotech, Germany [18]. Pellet-paint (Novagen) precipitated plasmid was subsequently transformed into the intermediate repA-positive host E. coli EC101. The plasmid was co-transformed into L. innocua FH2051 with the highly temperature-sensitive plasmid pVE6007 which supplies RepA in trans. Transformed cells appeared as blue colonies following plating on BHI-Ery-Xgal AZD8931 mouse at 30°C. The integration of pORI280 by single crossover homologous recombination was stimulated by picking a single blue colony from the transformation plate and incubating it on BHI-Ery-Xgal at 30°C for 24 h and subcultured

twice on BHI-Ery-Xgal at 42°C. A second crossover event, resulting in the introduction of PHELP Docetaxel nmr in place of PllsA and the eventual loss of the pORI280 vector, was screened for following multiple subcultures in the absence of antibiotic selection. The introduction of PHELP upstream of llsA in Ery resistant Cm sensitive colonies was confirmed by PCR. A haemolytic phenotype

was determined by spotting 10 μL of an overnight culture of this strain onto Columbia blood agar (Oxoid) containing 5% defibrinated horse blood (TCS Biosciences, Buckingham, UK) and 1 mU/ml sphingomyelinase (Sigma) and examining after 24 h. Pulsed- field gel electrophoresis Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was carried out following the CDC standardized PulseNet protocol for L. monocytogenes with AscI and ApaI as the restriction endonucleases. The PFGE patterns were analyzed using BioNumerics software [19]. Results and discussion Screening L. monocytogenes and L. innocua for homologues of llsA To date LIPI-3 has been identified in ~60% (27 of 46) of lineage I L. monocytogenes but was absent from all lineage II (n = 23) and lineage III (n = 5) isolates tested [8]. As a consequence of gaining access to the Seeliger collection of Listeria isolates [20], we were provided with the opportunity to screen for the presence of LIPI-3 among an additional 83 L. monocytogenes isolates including 30 lineage I, 50 lineage II and 3 lineage III strains. The llsA gene was not identified in any lineage II or lineage III strain, consistent with our previous observations (Table  1).

46) to the Kauffmann-White MDV3100 scheme. Res Microbiol 2004, 155:568–570.CrossRefPubMed PP2 10. Alcaine SD, Soyer Y, Warnick

LD, Su WL, Sukhnanand S, Richards J, Fortes ED, McDonough P, Root TP, Dumas NB, et al.: Multilocus sequence typing supports the hypothesis that cow- and human-associated Salmonella isolates represent distinct and overlapping populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72:7575–7585.CrossRefPubMed 11. Alcaine SD, Sukhnanand SS, Warnick LD, Su WL, McGann P, McDonough P, Wiedmann M: Ceftiofur-resistant Salmonella strains isolated from dairy farms represent multiple widely distributed subtypes that evolved by independent horizontal gene transfer. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005, 49:4061–4067.CrossRefPubMed 12. Sukhnanand S, Alcaine S, Warnick LD, Su WL, Hof J, Craver MP, McDonough P, Boor KJ, Wiedmann M: DNA sequence-based IACS-10759 mw subtyping and evolutionary analysis of selected Salmonella enterica serotypes. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43:3688–3698.CrossRefPubMed 13. Harbottle H, White DG, McDermott

PF, Walker RD, Zhao S: Comparison of multilocus sequence typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antimicrobial susceptibility typing for characterization of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2006, 44:2449–2457.CrossRefPubMed 14. Baumler AJ, Tsolis RM, Ficht TA, Adams LG: Evolution of host adaptation in Salmonella enterica. Infect Immun 1998, 66:4579–4587.PubMed 15. Kingsley RA, Baumler AJ: Host adaptation and the emergence of infectious disease: the Salmonella paradigm. Mol Microbiol 2000, 36:1006–1014.CrossRefPubMed

16. Rabsch W, Andrews HL, Kingsley RA, Prager R, Tschape H, Adams LG, Baumler AJ:Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium and its host-adapted variants. Infect Immun 2002, 70:2249–2255.CrossRefPubMed 17. Maiden MC, Bygraves JA, Feil E, Morelli G, Russell JE, Urwin R, Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zurth K, Caugant DA, et al.: Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:3140–3145.CrossRefPubMed 18. Guerra B, Vasopressin Receptor Junker E, Miko A, Helmuth R, Mendoza MC: Characterization and localization of drug resistance determinants in multidrug-resistant, integron-carrying Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium strains. Microb Drug Resist 2004, 10:83–91.CrossRefPubMed 19. Chu C, Chiu CH: Evolution of the virulence plasmids of non-typhoid Salmonella and its association with antimicrobial resistance. Microbes Infect 2006, 8:1931–1936.CrossRefPubMed 20. Gulig PA, Danbara H, Guiney DG, Lax AJ, Norel F, Rhen M: Molecular analysis of spv virulence genes of the Salmonella virulence plasmids. Mol Microbiol 1993, 7:825–830.CrossRefPubMed 21.

The primary mechanism of fusidic acid resistance in S. aureus relates to mutations in fusA, the gene that encodes the ribosomal translocase and translation elongation LCZ696 factor EF-G [12, 13]. More than 30 different amino acid substitution mutations in fusA have been identified [12, 14, 15]. Subsequently, resistance in natural isolates may also result from the horizontal acquisition of fusB, a poorly

characterized plasmid-mediated resistance mechanism [13]. The gene fusB is usually carried by a 21-kb plasmid, pUB101 [16], however, it can also be chromosomal [17]. The fusB gene encodes an inducible protein that protects an in vitro translation system against the inhibitory action of fusidic acid [8]. Recently, two fusB homologues, designated fusC and fusD, have been identified in the chromosome of clinical isolates of S. aureus and S. saprophyticus, respectively [18]. In addition, fusidic acid-resistant small-colony variants (SCVs) of S. aureus with mutations in rplF have been designated as FusE mutants [14]. Although frequencies of resistance to fusidic acid have remained generally low, each of these mechanisms has multiple genetic causes, and

emerging resistance is a problem that could limit the therapeutic options available for treatment of staphylococcal infections [19]. In this study, a series of MRSA clinical isolates recovered at a regional teaching hospital in middle Taiwan showing fusidic acid MIC ≥ 2 μg/ml. The high distribution check details of fusidic acid resistance determinants fusC was confirmed in MRSA. In addition, different fusidic acid resistance determinants-containing in one isolate was also this website demonstrated. Methods Bacterial isolates From April 2007 to January 2008, 34 clinical isolates of MRSA with fusidic acid resistance were recovered from 34 different patients MG-132 cell line at Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), a 1405-bed regional teaching hospital in central Taiwan. S. aureus ATCC 29213 and NCTC 8325 have consistently been used as a quality control strain and Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) standard strain, respectively. Luria-Bertani (LB) agar and LB broth were used for bacterial growth

at 37°C with aeration. Mueller-Hinton agar was used for all determinations of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). All isolates were identified on the colony morphology, Gram’s stain, a positive catalase reaction and/or results obtained with the phoenix system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD, USA) and frozen at -80°C until used. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests MICs of different antimicrobial agents were determined using the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD) and interpreted according to the criteria provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Fusidic acid susceptibility was screened by the disk diffusion method with 10 μg fusidic acid containing disks. The interpretive criterion of susceptibility was an inhibition zone ≥ 22 mm in diameter.

In addition of medical records reviewing, these patients were invited to entry in a follow-up research protocol. The post-trauma follow-up goals were: 1) to clinically evaluate patients, regarding complaints, past medical history, family history, and findings in the physical examination, 2) to evaluate kidney morphology and the renal blood flow by means of computed tomography of abdomen and MRA, 3) to evaluate renal function by using DMSA renal scintigraphy to detect and quantify differences

in renal function, 4) to evaluate the incidence of arterial hypertension in the follow-up of these cases by using ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring, 5) to evaluate if anatomical and functional kidneys alterations in association with arterial selleck products GDC-0973 manufacturer hypertension correlate with the grade of renal trauma, defined by CT, at the patient’s admission and 6) when hypertension were present, to investigate possible renal vascular etiology by dynamic 99mtechnetium ethylenedicysteine (99mTc EC) renal scintigraphy, using the captopril-stimulated study. For laboratory

evaluation, all patients of the study had: serum levels of urea and creatinine, electrolytes (sodium, potassium and calcium), total protein, albumin, lipidogram (cholesterol, LDL, HDL and triglycerides), hemoglobin, hematocrit, fasting glycemia and urine analysis. Abdominal CT scans were PI3K signaling pathway performed also, to detect and monitor complete resolution of perinephric hematoma and urinoma, when present. Magnetic resonance were performed on a 1.5 Tesla scanner, Magneton Vision, from Siemens (Erlangen – Germany), with a dedicate torso coil. We employed sequences to evaluate renal morphology and the status of major renal arteries. Our MG-132 cell line protocol includes images weighted in T1 and T2, on axial and coronal planes, using Gradient-Echo and Turbo Spin-Echo sequences. For MRA, we used the “bolus test” technique to set the ideal time for the arterial phase. A 3D-Gradient-Eco sequence was applied along the coronal plane for angiography (Repetition Time = 4.6 ms and

Echo Time =1.8 ms, flip angle of 25 degrees and 1.0 mm slice thickness). Images were processed at a Siemens workstation using Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) and Multiplanar Reformatting (MPR) techniques for angiography. Flow quantification was performed using phase-contrast sequence (TR = 24.0 ms, TE = 5.0 ms, Flip Angle = 30) with cardiac and respiratory gating. Flow measurements were also performed at the same workstation using the software Flow Quantification provided by Siemens Medical Systems. Peak systolic velocity and acceleration time were the additional hemodynamic parameters evaluated. Quantitative DMSA scintigraphy was performed in all patients. Differential renal function was calculated by adding the individual counts of both kidneys and recording the fractional contribution of each kidney as a percentage of total renal function.

Norrby S, Nord CE, Finch R: Lack of development of new antimicrobial drugs: a potential serious threat to public health. Lancet Infect Dis 2005, 5:115–9.PubMed 3. Lehrer RI, Ganz T: Cathelicidins: a family of endogenous antimicrobial peptides. Curr Opin Hematol 2002, 9:18–22.PubMedCrossRef 4. Lehrer RI: Primate defensins. Nature Rev Microbiol 2004, 2:727–738.CrossRef 5. Yang D, Biragyn A, Hoover DM, Lubkowski J, Oppenheim JJ: Multiple roles of antimicrobial defensins, cathelicidins, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in host defense. Annu Rev Immunol 2004, buy Tariquidar 22:181–215.PubMedCrossRef 6. Mygind PH, Fischer RL, et al.: Plectasin is a peptide antibiotic with therapeutic potential from a saprophytic fungus. Nature 2005, 437:975–80.PubMedCrossRef

7. Gottlieb CT, Thomsen LE, Ingmer H, Mygind PH, Kristensen H-H, Gram L: Antimicrobial peptides effectively kill a broad spectrum of Listeria monoc ytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus strains independently of origin, sub-type, or virulence factor expression. BMC Microbiol

2008, 8:205.PubMedCrossRef 8. Waldvogel FA: Staphylococcus aureus . In Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Edited by: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolio R. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995:1754–1777. 9. Vazquez-Boland SC79 JA, Kuhn M, Berche P, Chakraborty T, Dominguez-Bernal G, Goebel W, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Wehland J, Kreft J: Listeria Pathogenesis and Molecular Virulence Determinants. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001, 14:584–640.PubMedCrossRef 10. Brogden KA: Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005, 3:238–250.PubMedCrossRef Fossariinae 11. Ando T, Watanabe S: A new method for fractionation of protamines and amino acid sequences of salmine and 3 components of iridine. Int J Protein Res 1969, 1:221–224.PubMedCrossRef 12. Schneider T, Kruse T, Wimmer R, et al.: Plectasin, a fungal defensin, targets the bacterial cell wall precursor Lipid II. Science 2010, 328:1168–1172.PubMedCrossRef 13. Hale JD, Hancook RE: Alternative mechanisms of action of cationic antimicrobial peptides on bacteria. Expert

rec Anti Inf Ther 2007, 5:951.CrossRef 14. Torres VJ, Stauff DL, Pishchany G, Bezbradica JS, Gordy LE, Iturregui J, Anderson KL, Dunman PM, Joyce S, Skaar EP: A Staphylococcus aureus regulatory system that Temsirolimus responds to host heme and modulates virulence. Cell Host microbe 2007, 1:109–119.PubMedCrossRef 15. Everse J, Hsia N: The toxicities of native and modified hemoglobins. Free Radic Biol Med 1997, 22:1075–1099.PubMedCrossRef 16. Stauff DL, Torres VJ, Skaar EP: Signaling and DNA-binding activities of the Staphylococcus aureus HssR-HssS two-component system required for heme sensing. J Biol Chem 2007, 282:26111–26121.PubMedCrossRef 17. Stauff DL, Bagaley D, Torres VJ, Joyce R, Anderson KL, Kuechenmeister L, Dunman PM, Skaar EP: S taphylococcus aureus HrtA is an ATPase required for protection against heme toxicity and prevention of a transcriptional heme stress response. J Bacteriol 2008, 190:3588–3596.

The effects of LS081 on ferritin expression were determined under two conditions: RPMI1640-10% FCS to which 2 μM ferric ammonium citrate was added or RPMI with 10% iron saturated FCS. As shown in Figure 2, LS081 at 3 and 10 μM stimulated ferritin synthesis from both ferric ammonium citrate and iron saturated Tf. In preliminary

experiments the level of ferritin protein was not significantly increased by compound alone (data not shown). Figure 2 The effect of LS081 on ferritin expression. PC-3 cells were treated for 16 hr with DMSO alone, or 3 or 10 μM LS081 in the presence of non-transferrin-bound-iron selleck products (ferric ammonium citrate, left panel) or transferrin-bound-iron (Fe-saturated-Tf, right panel). The cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and ferritin heavy chain, and β-actin detected by Western blotting as described Pitavastatin in the Methods. The top panel shows a representative autoradiography. The bottom panel shows the ratio of ferritin to the actin loading control by densitometric analysis (mean values ± SEM of 3-4 separate experiments). *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01 compared

to DMSO alone by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttests. Iron LCZ696 facilitation is cytotoxic to cancer cells We examined the effect of the iron facilitator LS081 on ROS generation using DCFDA whose fluorescence intensity is increased in response to elevated intracellular ROS. As shown in Figure 3, K562 cells had significantly increased levels of ROS production when exposed to LS081 in the presence of ferric ammonium citrate but not with iron or LS081 alone. Figure 3 The effect of LS081 on ROS generation. Approximately 5 × 105 K562 cells were treated for 30 min with 0.1% DMSO alone, 10 μM ferric ammonium citrate alone, 3 or 10 μM LS081 alone, or the combination of Fe and LS081 at the indicated concentrations. The cells were then incubated with DCFDA and fluorescence measured by a BD Calibur Flow cytometer expressing the fluorescence as the mean total fluorescence intensity in the gated area. Shown are the means ± SEM of 3 separate

experiments with 2-3 replicates for each experiment. *** denotes P < 0.001 compared to the DMSO, Fe, or LS081 alone by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey's Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase posttests. The proliferation of PC-3 cells, a prostate cancer cell line, was not inhibited by 10 μM ferric ammonium citrate or 10 μM LS081 when cultured in 10% FCS-RPMI1640 for 24 or 48 hrs (Table 1) or 72 hr (data not shown). However, as also shown in Table 1, treatment with 10 μM LS081 plus 10 μM ferric ammonium citrate for 24 hr or 48 hr significantly reduced the number of cells relative to controls. When grown in serum-free medium (Figure 4), 267B1 cells, an immortalized, non-malignant prostate cell line, showed slight growth inhibition with 3 or 10 μM LS081 alone with no potentiation of growth inhibition by the addition of 2 μM ferric ammonium citrate.

Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2011, 63:730–747.CrossRef 25. Lvov Y, Decher G, Moehwald H: Assembly, structural characterization, and thermal behavior of layer-by-layer deposited ultrathin films of poly (vinyl sulfate) and poly (allylamine). Langmuir 1993, 9:481–486.CrossRef 26. Aliev FG, Correa-Duarte MA, Mamedov A, Ostrander JW, Giersig M, Liz-Marzán LM, Kotov NA: Layer-by-layer assembly of core-shell magnetite nanoparticles: effect of silica coating on interparticle interactions and magnetic properties. Adv Mater 1999, 11:1006–1010.CrossRef 27. Yang Y-J, Tao X, Hou Q,

Ma Y, Chen X-L, Chen J-F: Mesoporous silica nanotubes coated with multilayered polyelectrolytes for pH-controlled drug release. Acta Biomater 2010, 6:3092–3100.CrossRef 28. Köhler K, Sukhorukov GB: Heat treatment of polyelectrolyte multilayer capsules: a versatile method for encapsulation. Adv Funct Mater 2007, 17:2053–2061.CrossRef 29. Gao find more C, Möhwald H, Shen JC: Enhanced biomacromolecule encapsulation by swelling and shrinking

procedures. ChemPhysChem 2004, 5:116–120.CrossRef 30. Schmaljohann D: Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 2006, 58:1655–1670.CrossRef 31. Stuart MAC, Huck WT, Genzer J, Müller M, Ober C, Stamm M, Sukhorukov GB, Szleifer I, Tsukruk VV, Urban M: Emerging applications Idasanutlin clinical trial of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat Mater 2010, 9:101–113.CrossRef 32. Pechenkin MA, Möhwald H, Volodkin DV: pH-and salt-mediated response of layer-by-layer assembled PSS/PAH microcapsules: fusion and polymer exchange. Soft Matter Cell press 2012, 8:8659–8665.CrossRef 33. Kosmulski M: pH-dependent surface charging and points of zero charge II. Update.

J Colloid Interface Sci 2004, 275:214–224.CrossRef 34. Cho Y, Lee W, Jhon YK, Genzer J, Char K: Polymer nanotubules obtained by layer-by-layer deposition within AAO-membrane templates with sub-100-nm pore diameters. Small 2010, 6:2683–2689.CrossRef 35. Liu S, Ghosh K, Muthukumar M: Polyelectrolyte solutions with added salt: a simulation study. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:1813–1823.CrossRef 36. Mohan P, Rapoport N: Doxorubicin as a molecular https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pf-03084014-pf-3084014.html nanotheranostic agent: effect of doxorubicin encapsulation in micelles or nanoemulsions on the ultrasound-mediated intracellular delivery and nuclear trafficking. Mol Pharmaceutics 2010, 7:1959–1973.CrossRef 37. Su J, Chen F, Cryns VL, Messersmith PB: Catechol polymers for ph-responsive, targeted drug delivery to cancer cells. J Am Chem Soc 2011, 133:11850–11853.CrossRef 38. Chen M, He X, Wang K, He D, Yang S, Qiu P, Chen S: A pH-responsive polymer/mesoporous silica nano-container linked through an acid cleavable linker for intracellular controlled release and tumor therapy in vivo. J Mater Chem B 2014, 2:428–436.CrossRef 39. Wang Y, Shi W, Song W, Wang L, Liu X, Chen J, Huang R: Tumor cell targeted delivery by specific peptide-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles.

Cancer Res 2006, 66:3639–3648.PubMedCrossRef 11. Gaustad JV, Simonsen TG, Leinaas MN, Rofstad EK: Sunitinib treatment does not improve blood supply but induces hypoxia in human melanoma xenografts. BMC Cancer 2012, 12:388.PubMedCrossRef

12. Yankeelov TE, Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Gore JC: The role of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers in clinical trials of treatment response in cancer. Semin Oncol 2011, 38:16–25.PubMedCrossRef 13. Padhani AR: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in cancer patient management. Semin Radiat Oncol 2011, 21:119–140.PubMedCrossRef 14. Batchelor TT, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, Ancukiewicz M, Plotkin SR, Gerstner E, Eichler AF, Drappatz J, Hochberg FH, Benner T, et al.: Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular

endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent Epacadostat clinical trial glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:2817–2823.PubMedCrossRef 15. Loveless ME, Lawson D, Collins M, Nadella MV, Reimer C, Huszar D, Halliday J, Waterton JC, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE: Comparisons of the efficacy of a Jak1/2 inhibitor GDC-0994 in vitro (AZD1480) with a VEGF signaling inhibitor (cediranib) and sham treatments in mouse tumors using DCE-MRI, DW-MRI, and histology. Neoplasia 2012, 14:54–64.PubMed 16. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee TY, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, et al.: Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10:223–232.PubMedCrossRef 17. Tofts PS: Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997, 7:91–101.PubMedCrossRef 18. Egeland TA, Simonsen TG, Gaustad JV, Gulliksrud K, Ellingsen C, Rofstad EK: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumors: preclinical validation of parametric images. Radiat Res 2009,

172:339–347.PubMedCrossRef 19. Roskoski R Jr: Sunitinib: a VEGF and PDGF receptor protein kinase and angiogenesis inhibitor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007, 356:323–328.PubMedCrossRef 20. Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, Blackstein ME, Shah MH, Verweij J, McArthur G, Judson IR, Heinrich MC, Morgan JA, et al.: Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006, 368:1329–1338.PubMedCrossRef 21. Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Oudard S, Negrier S, Szczylik C, Pili R, Bjarnason GA, et al.: Overall survival and updated results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell ERK inhibitor carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009, 27:3584–3590.PubMedCrossRef 22. Raymond E, Hammel P, Dreyer C, Maatescu C, Hentic O, Ruszniewski P, Faivre S: Sunitinib in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Target Oncol 2012, 7:117–125.PubMedCrossRef 23.

PubMed 6. Tumbarello M, Spanu T, Sanguinetti M, Citton R, Montuori E, Leone F, Fadda G, Cauda R: Bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors, molecular epidemiology, and clinical outcome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006, 50:498–504.PubMedCrossRef 7. Roberts IS: The biochemistry and genetics of MM-102 capsular polysaccharide production in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 1996, 50:285–315.PubMedCrossRef 8. Sahly H, Keisari Y, Crouch E, Sharon N, Ofek I: Recognition of bacterial surface polysaccharides by lectins of the innate immune system and its contribution to defense against infection: the

case of pulmonary pathogens. Infect Immun 2008, 76:1322–1332.PubMedCrossRef 9. Rahn A, Drummelsmith J, Whitfield C: Conserved organization in the cps gene clusters for expression of Escherichia coli group 1 K antigens: relationship to the colanic acid biosynthesis locus and

the cps genes from Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 1999, 181:2307–2313.PubMed 10. Whitfield C, Roberts IS: Structure, assembly and regulation of expression of capsules in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 1999, 31:1307–1319.PubMedCrossRef 11. Whitfield C, Paiment A: Biosynthesis and assembly of Group 1 capsular polysaccharides in Escherichia www.selleckchem.com/products/cilengitide-emd-121974-nsc-707544.html coli and related extracellular polysaccharides in other bacteria. Carbohydr Res 2003, 338:2491–2502.PubMedCrossRef 12. Whitfield C: Biosynthesis and assembly of capsular polysaccharides in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Biochem 2006, 75:39–68.PubMedCrossRef Org 27569 13. Arakawa Y, Wacharotayankun R, Nagatsuka T, Ito H, Kato N, Ohta M: Genomic organization of the Klebsiella pneumoniae cps region responsible for serotype K2 capsular polysaccharide synthesis in the virulent strain Chedid. J Bacteriol 1995, 177:1788–1796.PubMed

14. Pan YJ, Fang HC, Yang HC, Lin TL, Hsieh PF, Tsai FC, Keynan Y, Wang JT: Capsular polysaccharide synthesis regions in Klebsiella pneumoniae serotype K57 and a new capsular serotype. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46:2231–2240.PubMedCrossRef 15. Shu HY, Fung CP, Liu YM, Wu KM, Chen YT, Li LH, Liu TT, Kirby R, Tsai SF: Genetic diversity of capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates. Microbiology 2009, 155:4170–4183.PubMedCrossRef 16. Fevre C, Passet V, Deletoile A, Barbe V, Frangeul L, Almeida AS, Sansonetti P, Tournebize R, Brisse S: PCR-based identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. rhinoscleromatis, the agent of rhinoscleroma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011, 5:e1052.PubMedCrossRef 17. Ho JY, Lin TL, Li CY, Lee A, Cheng AN, Chen MC, Wu SH, Wang JT, Li TL, Tsai MD: Functions of some capsular polysaccharide biosynthetic genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae NTUH K-2044. PLoS One 2011, 6:Selleck KU55933 e21664.PubMedCrossRef 18. Regue M, Hita B, Pique N, Izquierdo L, Merino S, Fresno S, Benedi VJ, Tomas JM: A gene, uge, is essential for Klebsiella pneumoniae virulence. Infect Immun 2004, 72:54–61.PubMedCrossRef 19.

New York: Springer;

2011:29–57. 20. Wilson KH, Wilson WJ, Radosevich JL, DeSantis TZ, Viswanathan VS, Kuczmarski TA, Andersen GL: High-density microarray of small-subunit ribosomal DNA probes. Appl Env Micro 2002, 68:2535–2541.CrossRef 21. Hazen TC, Dubinsky EA, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Piceno YM, Singh N, Jansson JK, Probst A, Borglin SE, Fortney JL, Stringfellow WT, Bill M, Conrad ME, Tom LM, Chavarria KL, Alusi TR, Lamendella R, Joyner DC, Spier C, Baelum J, Auer M, Zemla ML, Chakraborty R, Sonnenthal EL, D’haeseleer P, Holman HY, Osman S, Lu Z, Van Nostrand JD, Deng Y: Deep-sea oil plume enriches GDC-0449 supplier indigenous oil degrading bacteria. Science 2010, 330:204–208.PubMedCrossRef 22. Liu B, Pop M: ARDB-Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database. Nuc Acids Res 2009., 37: (Database issue):D443–7. [http://​ardb.​cbcb.​umd.​edu/​] 23. Brodie EL, DeSantis TZ, Joyner DC, Baek SM, Larsen JT, Andersen TGF-beta inhibitor review GL, Hazen TC, Richardson BI 2536 molecular weight PM, Herman DJ, Tokunaga TK, Wan JMM, Firestone MK: Application of a high-density oligonucleotide microarray approach to study bacterial population dynamics during uranium reduction and reoxidation. Appl Env Micro 2006, 72:6288–6298.CrossRef 24. Jackson CR, Denney WC: Annual and seasonal variation in the phyllosphere bacterial community associated with leaves of the southern magnolia ( magnolia grandiflora ). Plant Micro Interactions 2010, 61:113–122. 25. Ercolani GL: Pseudomonas savastanoi and other bacteria

colonizing the surface of olive leaves in the field. J Gen Micro 1978, 109:245–257.CrossRef 26. Araújo WL, Marcon J, Maccheroni W Jr, van Elsas JD, van Vuurder JWL, Azevedo JL: Diversity of

endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants. App Env Micro 2002,68(10):4906–4914.CrossRef 27. Gould AB, Lashomb JH: Bacterial leaf scorch (BLS) of shade trees. The Plant Health Instructor 2007. 28. Bulgari D, Casati P, Crepaldi P, Daffonchio D, Quaglino F, Brusetti L, Bianco PA: Restructuring of endophytic bacterial communities in grapevine yellows-diseased and recovered vitis vinifera L. Plants. App Env Micro 2011, 14:5018–5022.CrossRef 29. Zhang MQ, Duan YP, Zhou LJ, Turechek WW, Stover E, Cobimetinib mw Powell CA: Screening molecules for control of citrus huanglongbing using an optimized regeneration system for ‘ candidatus liberibacter asiaticus’-infected periwinkle ( catharanthus roseus ) cuttings. Phyto 2010, 100:239–245.CrossRef 30. Zhang MQ, Powell CA, Guo Y, Doud MS, Duan YP: A graft-based chemotherapy method for screening effective molecules and rescuing huanglongbing-affected citrus plants. Phyto 2012, 102:567–574.CrossRef 31. Schwarz RE, Van Vuuren SP: Decrease in fruit greening of sweet orange by trunk injection of tetracycline. Plant Dis Rep 1971, 55:747–750. 32. McManus PS, Jones AL: Epidemiology and genetic analysis of streptomycin-resistant erwinia amylovora from Michigan and evaluation of oxytetracycline for control. Phyto 1994, 84:627–633.CrossRef 33.