Phys Rev B 2009, 79:115409 CrossRef 39 Ding Y, Wang Y, Ni J, Shi

Phys Rev B 2009, 79:115409.CrossRef 39. Ding Y, Wang Y, Ni J, Shi L, Shi S, Tang W: First principles study of structural, vibrational and electronic properties of graphene-like, MX2 (M=Mo, Nb, W, Ta; X=S, Se, Te) monolayers. Physica B Condens Matter 2011,406(11):2254–2260.CrossRef 40. Ao Z, Li S, Jiang Q: Correlation of the applied

electrical field and CO adsorption/desorption behavior on Al-doped selleck compound graphene. Solid State Commun 2010,150(13–14):680–683.CrossRef 41. Tang S, Cao Z: Adsorption of nitrogen oxides on graphene and graphene oxides: insights from density functional calculations. J Chem Phys 2011,134(4):044710.CrossRef Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions QY performed the first-principles calculations and drafted the manuscript. ZS and SC participated in the calculation part. JL conceived of the study and helped in writing of the manuscript. All

authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background As superhard (hardness H ≥ 40 GPa) film material, nanocomposite films have been widely investigated in the past decades for use as wear-resistant coatings on tools and mechanical components [1, 2]. Among them, the pseudobinary TiN/SiN x is a representative film due to strong surface segregation of the constituent phases (TiN and SiN x have essentially no solid solubility). Especially, since hardness as high as 80 to 105 GPa was reported by Veprek et al. in 2000 [3], it has attracted much attention from the scientific community. So far the nanostructure and hardening mechanism have been widely

explained by nc-TiN/a-SiN x model proposed by Veprek ITF2357 et al. in 1995 [4], in which equiaxed TiN nanocrystallites (nc-TiN) were embedded in an amorphous SiN x (a-SiN x ) matrix. However, Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase this model is in dispute due to the lack of direct experimental evidence, which mainly reflects in two aspects. On one hand, whether TiN crystals are transformed from columnar crystals into equiaxed nanocrystallites is disputed, since there was no direct cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observation for the isotropic nature of the TiN grain. On the other hand, whether SiN x phase exists as amorphous state is also disputed, since Veprek et al. [4] suggested SiN x was amorphous because no obvious SiN x Bragg reflections in X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were found, which lacked direct observational evidence so far. Later, based on their high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) observations, Kong et al. [5] reported that TiN were columnar nanocrystals, rather than equiaxed nanocrystals, separated by crystallized SiN x interfacial phases. Hultman et al. [6] suggested that SiN x interfacial phase could be crystalline located around TiN nanocrystals according to their ab initio calculations. However, they did not give direct experimental evidence. In addition, the cross-sectional TEM published by Zhang et al.

Biomat 2004, 25:2533–2538 CrossRef 6 Tamilselvi S, Raghavendran

Biomat 2004, 25:2533–2538.CrossRef 6. Tamilselvi S, Raghavendran HB, Srinivasan Trichostatin A research buy P, Rajendran NJ: In vitro and in vivo studies of alkali-and heat-treated Ti-6Al-7Nb and Ti-5Al-2Nb-1Ta alloys for orthopedic implants. Biomed Mater Res A 2009, 90:380–386.CrossRef 7. Guo J, Padilla RJ, Ambrose W, De Kok IJ, Cooper LF: The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO 2 grit blasted titanium

implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Biomat 2007, 28:5418–5425.CrossRef 8. Gong D, Grimes CA, Varghese OK, Hu WC, Singh RS, Chen ZJ: Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation. Mater Res 2001, 16:3331–3334.CrossRef 9. Mello A, Hong Z, Rossi AM, Luan L, Farina M, Querido W: Osteoblast proliferation on hydroxyapatite thin coatings produced by right angle magnetron sputtering. Biomed Mater 2007, 2:67–77.CrossRef 10. Daugaard H, Elmengaard B, Bechtold JE, Jensen T, Soballe KJ: The effect on bone growth enhancement of implant coatings with hydroxyapatite and collagen deposited electrochemically and by plasma spray. Biomed Mater Res

A 2010, 92:913–921. 11. Nayaba SN, Jonesa PLX4032 nmr FH, Olsena I: Modulation of the human bone cell cycle by calcium ion-implantation of titanium. Biomat 2007, 28:38–44.CrossRef 12. Guo YP, Zhou Y: Nacre coatings deposited by electrophoresis on Ti6Al4V substrates. Surf Coat Tech 2007, 201:7505–7512.CrossRef 13. Fleisch H: Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. Endcr Rev 1998, 19:80–100.CrossRef 14. Russell RGG, Rogers MJ: Bisphosphonates: from the laboratory to the clinic and back again. Bone 1999, 25:97–106.CrossRef 15. Douglas DL, Russell RGG, Kanis JA, Preston CJ, Preston FE, Preston MA, Woodhead JS: Effect of dichloromethylene diphosphonate in Paget’s disease of bone and

in hypercalcaemia due to primary Autophagy activator hyperparathyroidism or malignant disease. Lancet 1980, 1:10443–10447. 16. Mundy GR, Yoneda TN: Bisphosphonates as anticancer drugs. Engl J Med 1998, 339:398–400.CrossRef 17. Hughes DE, MacDonald BR, Russell RGG, Gowen MJ: Inhibition of osteoclast-like cell formation by bisphosphonates in long-term cultures of human bone marrow. Clin Invest 1989, 83:1930–1935.CrossRef 18. Carano A, Teitlebaum SL, Konsek JK, Schlesinger PH, Blair HCJ: Bisphosphonates directly inhibit the bone resorption activity of isolated avian osteoclasts in vitro. Clin Invest 1990, 85:456–461.CrossRef 19. Sato M, Grasser W, Endo N, Akins R, Simmons H, Thompson DD, Glub E, Rodan GAJ: Bisphosphonate action: alendronate localization in rat bone and effects on osteoclast ultrastructure. Clin Invest 1991, 88:2095–2105.CrossRef 20. Murakami H, Takahashi N, Sasaki T, Udagawa N, Tanaka S, Nakamura I, Zhang D, Barbier A, Suda T: A possible mechanism of the specific action of bisphosphonates on osteoclasts: tildronate preferentially affects polarized osteoclasts having ruffled borders. Bone 1995, 17:137–144.CrossRef 21.

The pre-culture was harvested by centrifugation and resuspended i

The pre-culture was harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in physiological sodium chloride solution to achieve an OD600 of 1.5. The stomach-intestinal passage simulation was incubated using the adjusted solution and incubated for 7 h. The dashed line shows the addition of bile salts and pancreatic juice. Curves are the mean of duplicate experiments. The preparation of the inoculum of L. gasseri K7 in a 100 ml culture volume was also evaluated. The results of the experiments are shown in Figure 7. With 250 ml culture the decrease in living cells was about log 2 whereas the decrease with a

100 ml culture was only log 1 over the whole incubation time. However, 2 h after addition of bile salts and pancreatic juice, the decrease in cell counts was similar for both volumes. Discussion When harvesting a culture after a given incubation time, www.selleckchem.com/products/Sunitinib-Malate-(Sutent).html the growth phase of each bacterial strain can be different since all have

different growth dynamics. In order to obtain cells at approximately the same growth phase, preliminary experiments were performed (data not shown). An incubation time of 15 h for the pre-culture was suitable Sorafenib for all tested strains except Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis which needed to be incubated for only 12 h. The acid tolerance screening (Figures 2, 3 and 4) was performed to evaluate the effect of pH independently of other conditions. Bifidobacterium dentium was highly sensitive to acid and therefore would possibly not survive

the passage through the stomach. The strain was therefore not included in the simulation experiments. The B. longum strains (Figure 2) did not yield much better results than B. dentium (Figure 3). However, close to pH 4 they were more resistant than B. dentium. B. longum subsp. infantis is one of the first species to populate the human intestine shortly Interleukin-3 receptor after birth [26]. Based on the experiments in this study, however, the tested B. longum subsp. infantis strain would only be able to pass the infant stomach in high numbers if the transition time in the acidic stomach was very short. The survival of the selected strain in the tested environment was too low for successful passage in high numbers. When the strain was resuspended in skim milk, survival increased (Figure 5). This could be an indication that human milk helps B. longum subsp. infantis strains to pass the stomach-intestine passage with at a higher survival rate. The protective effects of milk proteins in the digestive system have already been described in the literature [27]. Protection with milk proteins has also been shown in this study (Figure 5). With the appropriate matrix or even a carrier, probiotic bacteria could safely pass through the stomach to the intestines to reach their site of action. B. adolescentis strains that populate the human intestine at a later age, had slightly higher resistance than B. longum subsp.