The blood level reported is at the lower end of the scale of previously reported fatalities (25–230 μmol/l) but definitely indicates significant hydrogen sulphide exposure – sufficient to cause unconsciousness, and possibly fatal poisoning. No thiosulphate was detected in urine, which is consistent with literature reports of sudden death caused by hydrogen sulphide (Kage et al., 2002) whereas survivors of hydrogen sulphide poisoning incidents tend to have raised urinary thiosulphate levels in the hours following the incident

as thiosulphate is excreted. It can therefore be concluded that the results of the thiosulphate analysis from blood and urine samples are consistent with acute hydrogen sulphide poisoning causing death rapidly. However, it should be noted that these analyses were conducted some nine months after the incident occurred. The samples were previously stored by a third party http://www.selleckchem.com/products/dabrafenib-gsk2118436.html and thought to have been refrigerated. There have been reports that sulphide can be generated post-mortem in blood and other tissues (Nagata et al., 1990) and this can then be converted to thiosulphate within the sample SCH772984 solubility dmso (Tsuge et al., 2000). However, it has also been reported that refrigerated storage suppresses such post-mortem sulphide production

(Nagata et al., 1990) which would therefore support the conclusion of acute hydrogen sulphide poisoning in this case. Mean background levels of thiosulphate in urine from people with no known overt exposure to thiosulphate have been reported as 2.9 mmol/mol creatinine

(standard deviation of 2.5 in a group of 29 individuals (Kangas and Savolainen, 1987)). Although, this is a limited dataset, it would tentatively suggest that a reference range for the general population might be approximately <7.9 mmol/mol creatinine (taking 95th percentile as the mean plus two standard deviations). Another study reported background levels of 1.36–4.89 mmol/mol creatinine (N = 13, ( Chwatko and Bald, 2009)). A controlled human volunteer study where a volunteer was exposed to 18 ppm hydrogen sulphide for 30 min (Kangas and Savolainen, 1987) has also been reported. The concentration of thiosulphate in urine increased after exposure, reaching a maximum of 30 mmol/mol creatinine at 15 h. Levels Vildagliptin had returned to normal by 17 h. However, no samples were taken between 5 and 15 h after exposure as this was overnight. It is therefore likely that the actual maximum concentration in urine is between 5 and 15 h. Because the morning void sample had accumulated thiosulphate over the preceding 10 h and the following sample (17 h) was back in the general population range, no estimation of excretion half-life is possible. A study (Farese, et al., 2011) looking at sodium thiosulphate pharmacokinetics indicates a serum half-life of roughly 40 min. Raised urinary thiosulphate levels in survivors have been used to demonstrate hydrogen sulphide exposure incidents (Table 1).