Secondary immune responses to A. ceylanicum in immune hamsters are known to be directed primarily

at the invasive larvae and possibly developing L4 stages (19), reducing worm burdens of these developmental stages rapidly within 2–3 days of re-infection, although usually some worms manage to complete development and then survive for many weeks. Despite giving a low-level challenge in the current experiment, there was a significant reduction in worm burdens in the immunized-challenged animals (Group 5, primary + secondary infections), compared with the challenge controls (Group 4), that was already apparent on day 10 p.c. as reported previously (19), but no evidence of any further significant loss over the following 3 weeks of the worms that had managed to establish successfully and survived the critical early see more phase of development. And this despite continuing erosion of villus height, hypertrophy of crypt depth, increased mucosal mitotic activity, greatly enhanced goblet cell and eosinophil density APO866 and increased Paneth cell counts. Surprisingly, compared with primary infections, mast cell counts remained unimpressive during secondary infections in immune animals (Figure 3), although they were raised marginally relative to naïve

animals in the third week after challenge. This was unexpected and it contrasts with earlier published data (19) in which an increase in mast cells Nintedanib order was detected in immune-challenged animals during the first 3 weeks post-challenge. However, in that experiment heavier challenge doses were used, and it is possible that with lower doses of larvae, as used here, too few worms established to generate and sustain a more intense mast cell response, such as that seen in animals harbouring

heavier adult worm burdens, as in Group 2, the continuous primary infection group. Nevertheless, we feel that this is unlikely given the vigorous goblet cell and eosinophil responses. It may simply be that in this particular experimental setting, the mast cell response was eclipsed by the vigour of the other cellular responses, which were amongst the most intense that we have ever observed in this host–parasite system. Equally it is possible that the mast cells in the immune-challenged animals were highly reactive and degranulating rapidly in the mucosa, before they could be fixed and quantified, as the method employed here was based on the specific staining of mast cell inclusions. This idea can be tested by assessing plasma and tissue levels of mast cell proteases, but unlike in mice and rats, no comparable antibody capture-based assays are available yet for hamster mucosal mast cell proteases.