CBA data was analysed using fcap Array software (BD Biosciences)

CBA data was analysed using fcap Array software (BD Biosciences). find more Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism software (Graphpad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance was determined using Kruskal–Wallis analysis with

Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test and Wilcoxon tests. We analysed NKT cells isolated from fresh human thymus, spleen, cord blood and adult peripheral blood. The mean NKT cell frequency of donor tissues were similar for peripheral blood (0·1 (mean) ± 0·02 [standard error of the mean (s.e.m.)], cord blood (0·06 ± 0·01) and spleen (0·08 ± 0·03), but significantly lower in thymus (0·007 ± 0·001). Most (> 90%) thymus and cord blood NKT cells were CD4+, with CD4− NKT cells seen mainly in peripheral blood and spleen (Fig. 1). In contrast to findings in mice that blood NKT cells provide a poor measure of NKT cell frequency in spleen [18], we found that human spleen and blood had similar mean frequencies of NKT cells and of CD4+ and CD4− NKT cell subsets, although this applies

to group analysis, rather than to each individual donor. A recent publication identified diversity within CD4+, CD4− and CD8+ NKT cell subsets, but these cells had been expanded prior to analysis. We analysed cell surface antigen expression by CD4+ and CD4− NKT cell subsets without in-vitro expansion and compared blood-derived NKT cells to those from Proteasome inhibitor cord blood, thymus and spleen (Fig. 2). Many antigens were expressed differentially by the CD4+ and CD4− NKT cell subsets (Fig. 2a–j), including CD56 and CD161 (confirming these as ineffective surrogate markers for human NKT cells), with CD161 expressed more highly in peripheral blood and spleen Etofibrate than cord blood or thymus. This confirms CD161′s status as a marker of NKT cell maturity [19, 22, 23]. Interestingly, CD161 was expressed by more CD4− than CD4+ NKT cells (Fig. 2a), which supports the hypothesis that comparatively immature precursors

of CD4− NKT cells are present within the CD4+ subset [22] [19, 23]. Our analysis did not identify any preferential surface antigen expression by either of the CD4+ or CD4 NKT cell subsets. CD8, CD45RA and CD94 were expressed typically by more CD4− NKT cells (Fig. 2i,j and data not shown), whereas CD62L, CD127 and LAIR-1 (Fig. 2c,d,b) were expressed by a higher proportion of CD4+ NKT cells. CD25, CD56, CD16, CD45RO, CD84, CCR7 and signalling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) were expressed differentially by both CD4+ and CD4− NKT cell subsets, but the pattern of expression was similar for each subset (Fig. 2a–j and data not shown). NKT cells from thymus, cord blood, peripheral blood and spleen expressed similar levels of most antigens, although there were exceptions: CD4 was expressed by more NKT cells in thymus and cord blood, CD161 was higher in peripheral blood, CCR7 expression was lowest in peripheral blood and CD25 was highest in cord blood.

Comments are closed.