2D), resulting in a high yield of iTreg cells. The blockade of LFA-1, therefore, does not exert its effect by merely lowering the TCR signal but actively changes the signaling involved in Foxp3 induction. This may

involve the blockade of LFA-1-mediated upregulation of Smad7, SKI and SMURF2 that renders CD4+ T cells refractory to TGF-β (Verma et al., 2012). To gain a greater insight into the role of LFA-1 during iTreg cell differentiation, its expression was assessed daily during the 7-day culture. As shown in Fig. 2E, although LFA-1 was expressed on all CD4+ T cells, the level of expression was differentially regulated on Foxp3− and Foxp3+ SB431542 order cells at the early stages of antigen-mediated iTreg cell differentiation, correlating with changes in the expression levels of CD4, CD62L and the marker of cell division, Ki67. This could relate to the activation status of the cells but, tantalizingly, this Selleck Nintedanib unequal distribution of LFA-1, in conjunction with the TCR co-receptor CD4 and coinciding with differential T cell proliferation, is also reminiscent of the recently described phenomenon of asymmetric cell division (Chang et al., 2007 and King et al., 2012). However, a role for this process in iTreg cell differentiation is not supported by the limited effect of variations in antigenic strength observed in conditions with anti-LFA-1 (Fig. 2C). A direct effect of LFA-1 blockade on susceptibility Casein kinase 1 to TGF-β signaling

(Verma et al., 2012) may, therefore, be the more likely explanation. As shown above, anti-LFA-1 treatment enhances the efficacy of antigen-mediated iTreg cell differentiation but the question remained whether this technique resulted in iTreg cells not only of higher purity but also of equal or greater functionality. First, the effect of anti-LFA-1 on the iTreg cell phenotype was assessed. Fig. 3A shows that CD62L, Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), CD103 and Helios, molecules commonly associated with Treg cell function,

were all expressed on a greater proportion of iTreg cells differentiated in the presence of anti-LFA-1 than in its absence. Next, the effect of LFA-1 blockade on the stability of Foxp3 expression was assessed since instability may be associated with undesirable immune responses mediated by iTreg cells that have reverted to an effector function. The stability of Foxp3 expression is regulated primarily by demethylation of the CNS2 region of the foxp3 promoter (Zheng et al., 2010). In our model, iTreg cells generated either with peptide and APCs or with plate-bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 demonstrated a level of methylation intermediate between that of Tconv cells and CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ splenic Treg cells (Fig. 3B). The addition of soluble anti-LFA-1 during differentiation did not lower the level of methylation and in the presence of the higher 10 μg dose of MBP Ac1-9 may have even impaired demethylation.