8 kg), powdered and exhaustively extracted with ethanol (95%) on a steam bath for 8 h thrice. The extract was concentrated under reduced pressure and left overnight at room temperature when a light brown solid deposited at the bottom of the flask. This ethanolic extract residue (4.5 g) was dried and the mother PI3K inhibitor liquor on concentration in vacuum using rotary flash evaporator afforded a dark brown semi-solid (104.5 g) which was successively re-extracted with pet. ether (60–80%) followed by dichloromethane which on concentration afforded dark brown solids (2.4 g
and 5.3 g respectively). Since the pet. ether and dichloromethane fractions exhibited a similar TLC profile (benzene:ethyl acetate, 1:1), they were mixed together for further studies. The ethanolic extract residue was chromatographed on an open normal silica column (h × Ø = 40 × 2 cm) eluted with pet. ether with increasing selleck chemicals llc amount of EtOAc affording n-hexacosane (0.198 g), polypodatetraene
(semi-solid), α-amyrin acetate (0.159 g), gluanol acetate (0.356 g), lupeol acetate (0.216 g), β-amyrin acetate (0.198 g) and bergenin (0.251 g). The pet. ether and dichloromethane fractions on column chromatography yielded 24,25-dihydroparkeol acetate (0.224 g), lanost-22-en-3β-acetate (0.175 g), gluanol acetate (0.229 g), lupeol acetate (0.140 g), α-amyrin octacosanoate (0.162 g), β-sitosterol (0.128 g) and β-sitosterol-β-D-glucoside (0.056 g) ( Fig. 1). The DPPH radical scavenging activity was determined by the method of Fogliano et al.9 A solution (2.5 ml) of 2 × 10−3 μg/ml of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) in methanol was mixed with equal volume (2.5 ml) of extract/test compound/ascorbic acid (standard) at different concentrations (10, 20, 40, 60, 80 μg/ml) in methanol. The mixture was shaken vigorously, and then kept in dark for 30 min. The absorbance was monitored at 517 nm using UV–Vis spectrophotometer. Blank was also carried out to determine the absorbance of DPPH, before interacting with the sample. The IC50 is the concentration of an antioxidant at which 50% inhibition of free radical activity Urease is observed. The decoloration i.e. DPPH scavenging effect (% inhibition)
was plotted against the sample extract concentration and a logarithmic regression curve was established in order to calculate the IC50. Fe3+ – Fe2+ transformation assay was carried out by Oyaizu’s method.10 To 1 ml of extract/test compound/ascorbic acid (standard) at different concentrations (62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1000 μg/ml) in ethanol was added 1 ml of distilled water, 2.5 ml phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 ml potassium ferricyanide (1%). The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. Trichloroacetic acid (2.5 ml, 10%) was added to the mixture, which was then centrifuged for 10 min. The upper layer of solution (2.5 ml) was mixed with distilled water (2.5 ml) and FeCl3 (0.5 ml, 0.1%) and the absorbance was measured at 700 nm using UV–Vis spectrophotometer.